This is our final cut of our first project. We feel this piece was very successful even though this was our first attempt of using the equipment and resources.
Keri, this is really good. You have used a decent sample size and have some interesting responses. There are some great uses of on screen titles and cuts between shots/interviewees. Perhaps next time we can intercut between these interviewees ( a bit like the TV show First Dates does with the dates) so that we don't spend so long with each response in a row.
Can you add something about the responses. Did you get the responses you thought you would? What do YOU as a filming team think about the people you interviewed, would you ask the same demographics again? What would be your response if asked this question?
The Gold Rush (1925) Take 3 scenes from 'The Gold Rush' (1925) and analyse the micro elements of film form, identifying how these elements construct meaning. M icro-elements of film EXTRA Cinematography and Special Effects (throughout) Special Effects add on to the comedic performances. Practical effects, like the choice of having smoke steam out the shoe in minute 17:00, enhance the already funny scene. Other effects are more cinematographic and have to do with the choice of lenses and angles. A POV shot of Chaplin as a chicken from delirious Big Jim’s perspective (21:00) shows how hunger is really pushing Big Jim’s view of reality to a surreal and funny world by imagining his companion as a chicken he would like to eat. The story follows the Tramp as he goes off to seek his fortune in the Alaskan gold fields, along with prospectors both good and greedy with whom he falls in and falls out...
Sound in love actually When looking at sound, we focussed on a scene from love actually. This scene is the opening scene and has dialog over the top of videos from Heathrow airport. When watching it we first listened to it with the sound turned on, and then listened to it with the sound turned off. We then had to identify all of the different sounds in the video. The main feature of the video was the voice over by David (Huge Grant) and then we also noticed the music behind it. We also learned about diegetic and non- diegetic sound. Diegetic sound is the sound that is actually in the scene. Non diegetic sound is when the sound is not picked up on screen and so has to be added during the edited process. For example, music being added to increase the tension or to make it a recognisable movie and also the voice over to add a personal perspective of the scene. This also adds detail and background knowledge. This gets added in during the editing process. When making the...
Sound in 13 Reasons why When looking at sound, we focussed on a scene from 13 reasons why. When watching it we first listened to it with the sound turned on, and then listened to it with the sound turned off. We then had to identify all of the different sounds in the video. Obviously the music was a main feature of the video and then we also noticed the foot steps when Clay was walking down the corridor, as well as the school bell at they end of the video. The dialogue that Hannah was speaking had to be recreated by someone else. We also learned about diegetic and non- diegetic sound. Diegetic sound is the sound that is actually in the scene, for example the footsteps when Clay was walking down the corridor, or when the actors are speaking in the scene. Non diegetic sound is when the sound is not picked up on screen and so has to be added during the edited process. For example, music being added to increase the tension or to make it a recognisable movie, s...
Keri, this is really good. You have used a decent sample size and have some interesting responses. There are some great uses of on screen titles and cuts between shots/interviewees. Perhaps next time we can intercut between these interviewees ( a bit like the TV show First Dates does with the dates) so that we don't spend so long with each response in a row.
ReplyDeleteCan you add something about the responses. Did you get the responses you thought you would? What do YOU as a filming team think about the people you interviewed, would you ask the same demographics again? What would be your response if asked this question?